Questionnaire on Good Practice in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Public Participation in the Arctic
The Arctic EIA project is looking for examples of good practice from EIA projects undertaken across the Arctic circumpolar region. Have you taken part in a well-executed EIA? Or is there a specific component of an EIA, like public participation or mitigation measures that has been completed so successfully that it could be used as an example of good practice? If so, we would like you to tell us about your experiences.
What is a good practice? Good practice, broadly speaking, is a practice or procedure that has proven to work well, has produced good results, and can therefore be recommended as a model.
The purpose of this questionnaire is to identify and collect good practices in order to share and refine them into good practice recommendations for how EIA should be conducted in the Arctic. The questionnaire is targeted to all EIA stakeholders: Indigenous Peoples and other Arctic residents and communities, authorities, developers, consultants, NGOs, scholars and any other interested participant.
We appreciate you taking the time to fill out this questionnaire. Responses will be analyzed by the Arctic EIA project’s Editorial group. Reporting of the results of the questionnaire will happen on a general level and will not be connected to the personal information of the respondent.
If you need more information, or would prefer to participate in a telephone interview, rather than submit a written response, please contact the Project coordinator, Päivi A. Karvinen using the following e-mail or telephone number:
tel. +358 50 308 0194
Please, feel free to distribute this questionnaire within your community of EIA practitioners and others who may be interested in responding.
We’d kindly ask your responses by December 22, 2017.
In filling out this questionnaire, you are kindly asked to respond to the following three components of interest:
Part I) contemplate and comment in a generalized way about what, in your opinion, constitutes good practice for EIA in the Arctic,
Part II) describe a specific example or a number of examples that in your opinion, exemplify good practice in EIA; and,
Part III) provide your background and contact information.
None of the questions in Parts I and Part II are compulsory. You are welcome to skip any question that does not seem relevant to the good practice ideas or examples you want to highlight.
You should be able to complete the questionnaire in 15 to 45 minutes, depending on the characteristics and complexity of the example(s) that you wish to highlight. Thank you very much for your cooperation.


6. Which country is the project located?
7. Is your example referring to the entire EIA process?
8. Is your example referring to some particular component(s) of an EIA process? Particular components may include but are not restricted to the following. You can use this list as a reference only or mark one or more components to describe your example.
Assesment of impacts
You may also share documents by sending them to or Päivi A. Karvinen, Ministry of the Environment, P.O. Box 35, 00023 GOVERNMENT, Finland
I have participated in or followed:
My experience of EIA(s) is mostly in a role of a
Permission to contact

Thank you for taking the time to complete this questionnaire. Your contribution is highly valued and we very much appreciate your input in the Arctic EIA project!